David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon 11 Jun 2012 11:55, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: >>> >>>> Tables are a superset of what I need here. I need the "growable vector" >>>> aspect, not the "hash part" aspect. Guile 1.8 only offers subsets: >>>> "growable" does not come together with "vector". >>> >>> Why not just make your own growable vectors, then? It will be just as >>> efficient. >> >> Sure, I will. A native implementation would be able to benefit from >> storage layout conditions that would, in some cases, allow extending the >> array without allocating a new memory range, so it _can_ be done. > > P.S.: I still need to look at vlists. They might already address this > issue, though I can't use them in Guile 1.8.
No, the "immutable" angle would make them unsuitable again. -- David Kastrup
