Noah Lavine <[email protected]> writes:
> The only change I was considering is allowing an arbitrary number of
> arguments, but that's something I can implement if people agree that
> we want the functions in (ice-9 q).
I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and
the lack of a distinct type, less than satisfactory.
However, if you are going to add them, I'd recommend sticking with the
q- prefix. So, q-append and q-append!. Keeping the naming consistent
means one less exception to remember.
Also, I think it might be wise to add a list->q and q->list, with the
obvious simple implementations
(define (q->list q)
(car q))
(define (list->q l)
(if (null? l)
(make-q)
(cons l (last-pair l))))
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
