On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 00:29 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > I am not sure about the licensing there. That module is copyrighted, > > though GPLv3+. A merge /may/ require the original author to assign > > the copyright. > > It’s not a requirement, but we should probably try to get in touch with > him (Richard Todd) because he actually has a copyright assignment on > file for Guile. > > Nala: Would you like to ask him if he’s OK with having (term ansi-color) > integrated as part of Guile? In that case, it would fall under FSF > copyright. >
I'll ask him later. But I think we just need part of his code, and I rewrote most of it to be compatible with my implementation. Anyway, I'll borrow his 'color-string' to give a way for the user to color the string as they wish. Since (term ansi-color) code is small one, except for the comment, do we still need to ask him for integration? IMO, we just borrowed something interfaces from his code. Another question: I'll try to patch the colorized into 'pretty-print' now, but is it expected? Or just leave it as a independent module? Which is the proper way for the maintainer? > Thanks! > > Ludo’. > >
