On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sat 12 Jan 2013 16:21, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > We'd like to start up guildhall.gnu.org, which is a guilers community
> > MAYBE based on savannah to let you guys share/fetch Guile packages. Just
> > like rubygems.org does. ;-)
>
> FWIW we do have access to a guildhall.gnu.org and are in the process of
> setting it up.
>
> > 1. Package verify policy (PVP)
> > 2. Package evaluate policy (PEP)
>
> Sounds sensible to me.  Would you like to start working on software to
> do this?
>
>
Yes, but do we have some kind of spec standard for guildhall packages?
If answer is no, I'll do some post-work before the policy discussion.
And another related question bothered me for a long time: which is
guildhall's upstream
repo now? ijp's? or andy's?
I think ijp's repo is newer now, maybe do a merge work is better.


> WDYT about this workflow: we work via the GNU bug tracker that we
> already have in Guile.  When someone has a new package, they mail
> bug-gu...@gnu.org with the information, creating a ticket.
>
>
It's fine to take advantage of the bug tracker, except for 'bug' ;-P
Isn't there any other way for the transaction with GNU things?
I'll throw it into my TODO list.
(error TODO "your list is overflow!")


> We will have a GPG keyring for guildhall maintainers.  We can rig up
> some special email account, perhaps at gnu.org, to queue jobs for the
> guildhall.  Guildhall maintainers can then queue the addition or update
> of a package via mail, verified with their key.


Mark and me both have GNU account, is it enough? Or we'll have an extra one?


> We should also write a
> web application that lists recent updates to the guildhall.
>
>
We may write a simple one for just working, and after my Glow(Guile Lauch
on Web) done, we may write a brand new site for a whole guildhall in a Ruby
on rails like way.
God knows when it's done...but in a long term, such a thing would be
expected by any folks.

Thanks!


> WDYT?
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
>

Reply via email to