> From: Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès), [email protected], > [email protected] > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: > > Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to > > configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default > > for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal. > > FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In > the last couple of weeks, madsy on #guile reported cross-building a > recent Guile snapshot (stable-2.0 branch) using MinGW
Which MinGW? It sounds like nowadays one needs to distinguish between the various flavors. The exact port of pthreads and gc might also matter. > with thread support enabled and without --disable-posix, and it > seems to work reasonably well. It runs the REPL without problems > and passes much of the test suite. Good to know; I hope to see a release some place near me in a not-so-distant future, and will test this at that time.
