Thompson, David writes:
>> I'm a big fan of CI (automated testing), and maybe you are too. I'd
>> love to have CI for reviewing patches of Guile.
>
> This is a good idea.
+1
> That's unfortunate. It's important to build from scratch, which means
> bootstrapping the compiler, which indeed takes awhile, but patches
> generally take days or longer to be reviewed and merged so a few hours
> is no big deal, IMO. The GNU Guix project is working on a replacement
> for its current CI system at hydra.gnu.org that runs Hydra from the
> Nix project, named Cuirass, so I think we should try to use that
> instead of GitLab.
I so much like this idea, that I contributed some patches to Cuirass to
do exactly this. Next to being a CI dedicated for GuixSD to track any
package's git. Here's the discussion
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/threads.html#01338
patches are in Cuirass now and anyone is much encouraged to play.
> I think this is a wonderful idea that could use a new implementation.
> Thanks for getting the ball rolling with the proof-of-concept!
Yes!
Greetings,
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
