On Tue 07 Mar 2017 15:31, Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes: >>> On Hurd, calls to setitimer and getitimer for the profiling >>> and virtual timers will always fail with ENOSYS. >>> On Cygwin, calls to setitimer and getitimer for the >>> profiling and virtual timers will always fail with EINVAL. > >>Is it possible to avoid defining these interfaces if they will never >>work? > >>Is that even a good idea? :) Maybe not. Would be better to have >>(defined? 'setitimer) or so. If not, a setitimer feature I guess -- >>(provided? 'setitimer). > This is what I came up with > branch wip-itimer-checks > commit f5b362586d7622c408d4402c7cb496c45ffb56e8 > What do you think?
Looks great. Thank you, please push! Andy
