> On Sep 17, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Matt Wette <[email protected]> writes: >> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small. >> Can someone post the sample guix specification? >> I could not access from the gnunet log. > > Do you mean the wisp package for Guix?
No, I meant the guix package spec for package foo written in wisp.
define-public foo
package
name "guile-wisp"
source : origin
...
Thanks,
Matt
