Fun I can agree with! It is what made me stick with Guile in the first place.
GNU as an adjective seems odd: I think that can better be conveyed as a part of the name "GNU Guile". It is and, if I have understood the discussions going on here, will continue to be a GNU project. Maybe treat fun as a noun: GNU Guile - fast functional fun :D I'd leave the fine details of taglines to someone who is better versed in english than me, though. -- Linus Björnstam On Sat, 18 Jan 2020, at 15:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guilers! > > The Guile logo has this “GNU extension language” baseline. As Guile 3 > came out, this baseline felt odd to me, not quite corresponding to the > way I see Guile. > > Clearly, Guile is still an extension language, with many great > applications (Gnucash, Lepton-EDA, OpenCog, GDB, etc.), and I’m sure > libguile is here to stay. Yet, to me, “extension language” does not > accurately capture what Guile today allows for and what people have been > doing with it; since 2.0, it’s more than an extension language, even > more so with the performance afforded by Guile 3. > > Thus, I’d propose changing the baseline. Something that would describe > what Guile is to me is: > > GNU, fast, fun, functional > > What’s about you? What’s Guile to you? :-) > > Ludo’. > > Attachments: > * signature.asc