Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes:

> OK, fair enough. I'll push a patch on mkdtemp! in a day or two if
> you're good with the idea.  (I asked on IRC.) But, one thing I'd like
> to change, if you don't mind, is the split into scm_i_mkdtemp and
> scm_mkdtemp because there is no internal client of scm_i_mkdtemp.

Oh, offhand, that seems fine to me -- I don't know that I had any reason
for that other than that I just copied and adapted what had been done
for mkstemp.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Reply via email to