Am Freitag, dem 19.11.2021 um 13:35 +0000 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Jonas Hahnfeld schreef op vr 19-11-2021 om 14:32 [+0100]:
> > > You coud simply ...
> > >
> > >
> > > > - scm_gc_free (rx, sizeof(regex_t), "regex");
> > > > + free (rx);
> > >
> > > drop the scm_gc_free AFAIK.
> >
> > No, I cannot as explained in the patch summary: If we use
> > scm_gc_free
> > in a free function of a Smob, this relies on Java finalization
> > because
> > the memory must not be reclaimed in the same cycle.
>
> The suggestion was to remove scm_gc_free, and not introduce free.
> I.e., don't free rx manually at all, let boehmgc decide:
>
> regex_free (SCM obj)
> {
> regfree (SCM_RGX (obj));
> - scm_gc_free (SCM_RGX (obj), sizeof(regex_t), "regex");
> return 0;
> }This is dangerous because we still pass the memory to regfree, so it must not be freed before.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
