On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:51:50PM +0000, Chris Vine wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:03:17 +0100 > Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: > > Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchi...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:05 AM Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Andy Wingo schreef op vr 11-02-2022 om 08:47 [+0100]: > > >> > We are delighted to announce GNU Guile release 3.0.8, the latest in the > > >> [...] > > >> > The Guile 3.0.8 release mixes maintenance and optimizations [...] > > >> > > >> > > > Am I the only one who has not received the announcement? > > > > No. I also haven’t received it. > > I didn't receive it either, on either guile-user or guile-devel. It > looks as if something may be amiss with the mailing list servers.
FWIW, I did receive it, and the To: header field looks innocent enough: To: guile-u...@gnu.org, guile-sour...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, info-...@gnu.org Here are the more envelope-ish headers: From guile-devel-bounces+tomas=tuxteam...@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 08:48:40 2022 Return-path: <guile-devel-bounces+tomas=tuxteam...@gnu.org> Envelope-to: to...@tuxteam.de Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:48:40 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by mail.tuxteam.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <guile-devel-bounces+tomas=tuxteam...@gnu.org>) id 1nIQfY-0000rR-Jv for to...@tuxteam.de; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:48:40 +0100 ...so it seems it came through guile-devel@ I haven't checked whether the DKIM signature is good, though. So maybe... Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature