On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote: > On 21-08-2022 02:05, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote: > > > According to the spec, embedding inline content in the <script> tag > > should conform to the language defined by the "type" attribute (defaults > > to javascript). So, I would expect you could put any string that > > conforms to JS. > > > > """ > > When used to include dynamic scripts, the scripts may either be embedded > > inline or may be imported from an external file using the src attribute. > > If the language is not that described by "text/javascript", then the > > type attribute must be present, as described below. Whatever language is > > used, the contents of the script element must conform with the > > requirements of that language's specification > > I am proposing to use XHTML (which is XML), not HTML. HTML's special parsing > quirks are irrelevant here.
Yes, the problem evaporates with XHTML. If you are at the generating side (like here), that's definitely an option. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
