> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David <dthomps...@worcester.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which >> would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’. > > 'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you mean some different > implementation of it? > > - Dave
The current bytevector-copy takes a single argument. I would extend it in the same way the srfi4 copy functions were extended recently in the following commit http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commitdiff;h=6be51f9bbf47692ee5747b2cac6b372df65de970 <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commitdiff;h=6be51f9bbf47692ee5747b2cac6b372df65de970> Regards Daniel
