Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> writes: > That said, I think that in Scheme, standard is quite different from portable > – if something standard is implemented, it will be (mostly) according > to the standard, so in this way it is ‘portable’, but that’s a big ‘if’. For > large Schemes (and small Schemes for which the RnRS or SRFI stuff is > implemented in a separate library that can easily be installed(*)), I don’t > expect much trouble, but for very minimalistic (or outdated Schemes, > but that holds for other languages as well) you might possibly be in trouble. > > (As mentioned earlier, I also want to mention that (srfi srfi-N) is not > portable, it’s a Guile-ism.)
Is (import (srfi :N)) portable in practice? I switched from (use-modules ...) to (import ...) to get towards making my code easier to re-use on different Schemes, but I didn’t actually try using it on another Scheme implementation. (I hope it’s OK that I pick your brain on this) Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
