Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes:

> I'd recommend adding credits to the documentation too, as I had done for
> example in the (unreviewed/unmerged)
> <https://lists.gnu.org/r/guile-devel/2023-12/msg00080.html> series.

Thanks, and done. I also put each "Additionally" license inside a
@quotation block so it'll be more clearly delineated in the rendered
text.

> Upstream is also opened to make old SRFIs compatible with this new
> guideline, which I've done for the SRFIs appearing in the series
> mentioned earlier, so the source files licenses are self-explanatory and
> need not be manually annotated in Guile, e.g.:

I went ahead and moved SRFI-197 to the newer commit so we have the new
SPDX headers, but I also kept the license text in each file for now
under the assumption that I should stick to the current convention
until/unless Guile itself adopts SPDX.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Reply via email to