Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> R5RS is pretty clear about the relation between '=' and 'eqv?' and we
> should follow that (even tho one could argue that R5RS has not been
> written with signed zeros and NaNs in mind and R6RS will likely be
> different in this area).
[...]
> Ok?
OK with me (although I'm not at all a numerical analysis expert).
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
