"Ludovic Courts" wrote: > It's a valuable document but more like a tutorial, > so I don't think it belongs in the reference manual.
If this is the taylor-cut for the manual, fine. > The `guile-core' module has a `doc/tutorial' directory > but I guess the material in there is largely outdated. Only on the C interface. > Nevertheless, it might make sense to revive that > tutorial and put your work on structures in there. > What do you think? IMHO "guile-tut" should be updated, but not with the addition of much material. It is better to remove the unfinished sections and the C interface related sections, so that it becomes a fast-read introduction to Guile. It would be easier to maintain it that way. I can try such a clean up, and propose a document for review. If it is fine with you: you can create a "doc/contrib" directory in which to put monothematic documents. If there are no problems, I use GNU FDL. -- Marco Maggi "They say jump!, you say how high?" Rage Against the Machine - "Bullet in the Head" _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
