l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
>
>> Yes, but amusingly this copy of the manual is only linked from the
>> "support for many SRFIs" link on
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/guile.html, and from inside Daniel's
>> tutorial.
>
> And from http://gnu.org/manual/ .
Ah, thanks.
> Indeed. I think I’ve always been updating the one at guile/manual,
> since it’s the usual way to place GNU manuals, but I must have forgotten
> to check the links under guile/. I’d be in favor or removing ‘docs-1.8’
> and keeping just ‘manual’. What do you think?
Agreed, and I've done that now.
>>> (BTW, Gnulib has a new script to automate updates to
>>> www.gnu.org/software/PROJECT/manual.)
>>
>> Right; I assume you mean gendocs.sh.
>
> I was thinking about the ‘gnu-web-doc-update’ module.
I'll take a look, thanks.
>> Do you have strong views on whether we should use current Git or the
>> latest pre-release? I don't think it matters much, and current Git is
>> marginally easier.
>
> Either way is fine with me.
Cool, I'll sort out a 1.9/2.0 set of docs later.
Neil
