-[ Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:18:30PM +0100, Neil Jerram ]---- > But you could get a similar effect - which I think will still work in > 1.9/2.0 - by creating a module, defining values in it, and then > evaluating in that module. (In Guile, module == top level > environment.)
I was trying to avoid binding values to variables because I believe it would be too slow. I think, having performed no measurment, that passing the values as function parameters is much faster than manualy binding these values to an environment. But maybe I'm wrong, and function parameters are actualy implemented in a way similar to an alist ?
