Richard Shann <[email protected]> writes:
> Well it seems I may have been premature in saying that srfi-1 was
> successfully loaded. Although the error message is gone, there is no
> symbol 'map which srfi-1 should have re-defined.
> Can someone suggest what this might be a symptom of?
I wrote:
> I know what's wrong. Please try replacing the calls to
> 'scm_c_register_extension' with the following:
>
> scm_c_define_module ("srfi srfi-1", init_srfi_1, NULL);
> scm_c_define_module ("srfi srfi-60", init_srfi_60, NULL);
[...]
Sorry, this isn't quite right either. Instead of the above, please try
replacing the calls to 'scm_c_register_extension' with the following:
scm_c_call_with_current_module (scm_c_resolve_module ("srfi srfi-1"),
init_srfi_1, NULL);
scm_c_call_with_current_module (scm_c_resolve_module ("srfi srfi-60"),
init_srfi_60, NULL);
Where 'init_srfi_1' and 'init_srfi_60' are defined as follows:
static SCM
init_srfi_1 (void *dummy)
{
scm_init_srfi_1 ();
return SCM_UNSPECIFIED;
}
static SCM
init_srfi_60 (void *dummy)
{
scm_init_srfi_60 ();
return SCM_UNSPECIFIED;
}
Hopefully this will work. I'm too lazy to try it myself.
Mark
