On Fri 15 Jul 2016 16:26, Pierre Lairez <pierre.lai...@gmail.com> writes:
> When running the following loop: > (do ((i 1 (+ 1 i)) > (j 0 i)) > ((> i 4) (newline)) > (display (list i j))) > > I expect without hesitation to read > (1 0)(2 1)(3 2)(4 3) > > To my surprise, I obtain > (1 0)(2 2)(3 3)(4 4) Fixed. Turns out I had already found and fixed this in master (4632f3d9988f9a234298b7cc860b2374e2bcc712), but for some reason didn't back-port the fix. Done now. Thanks for the report, Andy
