Catonano writes: > Now, I like to remind that Ludo had proposed to _mention_ guile-hall in the > guix.texi manual !! > > Here: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2018-07/msg00002.html > > "I think we should advertise it widely" > > I wholeheartedly agree > > This is an important step in making the Guile user experience less rough > > Where, in the manual, should such mention be placed ?
The comparative frustration I had with having to use autotools for simple guile projects vs when I was developing in Racket was one of the things that came up in my FOSDEM talk last year. I didn't know that in my absence Guile Hall came to be, though people told me later. I'm excited that Guile Hall has reduced this overhead considerably, so I agree with all the above. That's all to say, thank you Alex for working on one of the most important problems in Guile! This is great!
