> This is really cool! Thanks!
> Maybe it doesn't make sense, but could the `(guile ...) be handled by > the same running process instead of creating another process, so you > just pass this to the plumber? Yes, it makes sense when a Guile code runs locally; it could be possible to run the code in a different thread instead of spawning a new Guile process. On the other hand, I'd love to have uniformity in the way the Guile code is handled in the pipeline, either locally or remotely; that also means when executed locally it does not affected by the current program state and cannot modify in any way as it would be if I'd run it in a new thread. Nevertheless, big thanks for thought-provoking suggestions and the patch (I merged it today.) - Artyom -- Artyom "avp" Poptsov <poptsov.art...@gmail.com> CADR Hackerspace co-founder: https://cadrspace.ru/ GPG: D0C2 EAC1 3310 822D 98DE B57C E9C5 A2D9 0898 A02F
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
