On 1/17/22 3:16 AM, Chris Vine wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 20:39:47 +0000 > Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: > >> Thanks for the example link and the explanations! I'll try to learn from the >> example. >> >> Best regards, >> Zelphir >> >> On 1/16/22 5:45 PM, Luis Felipe wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 16th, 2022 at 1:37 PM, Zelphir Kaltstahl >>> <zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Which things are part of GTK and which things are part of Gnome? Currently >>>> my >>>> picture is: GTK contains all the GUI things and Gnome the data things. For >>>> example: GTK might contain some date picker dialog or popup or whatever, >>>> but the >>>> datatype for date itself would be part of Gnome. "GDate". As such Gnome >>>> provides >>>> a sort of common datatypes basis, which could be used by other frameworks >>>> as >>>> well (and maybe is?). >>> Maybe this can serve as an overview of where is everything: >>> >>> For generic GTK apps (not necessarily targeted at GNOME): >>> https://www.gtk.org/docs/apis/ >>> >>> For GTK apps that integrate well with GNOME: >>> https://developer.gnome.org/documentation/introduction/components.html >>> >>> Also, for new projects, if you would like your app to adapt well to >>> different screens, like modern web apps do, maybe take a look at libhandy >>> (https://gnome.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/libhandy/) and libadwaita >>> (https://gnome.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/libadwaita/doc/). The latter, if I >>> understand correctly will replace the former. >>> >>> Also, note that Glade (https://glade.gnome.org/) only supports GTK 3, and >>> there doesn't seem to be any plans to support GTK 4, so people seem to be >>> writing GUIs by hand in GTK 4 projects. > Can you please not top post? > > The posting to which you have replied has not appeared with me. But it > (and the comments concerned) have nothing to do with gobject-introspection > or guile-gi. "Understanding guile-gi" still appears as the notional title > of this thread so if you want to change the subject you might want also to > change the title to avoid complete confusion. > Hi Chris!
By "top post" you mean writing an answer or a reply above the part, that is quoted? I assume so. I have only quoted e-mail text, which immediately has to do with my original question and a subject, which I myself chose. So I don't know how you can possibly get the idea, that those have nothing to do with the topic. Perhaps the confusion stems from something in your e-mail client, that displays top posted replies weirdly? In my e-mail client it is very clear, what is quoted text and what is the reply. I am unaware of the specific problem, potentially caused by "top posting". I am also not "changing" the subject here. Or do you mean "If you ever want to change the subject, it would be better to do have the posts be written in a different way."? I am replying to someone, who replied to my topic starter e-mail. I am not intending to change the title at the moment. Lastly, I was not aware, that there is a "bottom post" rule or convention on this mailing list. If that is indeed the case, I will try to remember in the future. Thanks for the hint. Regards, Zelphir -- repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl