Den ons 9 feb. 2022 21:12Christine Lemmer-Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> skrev:
> > ice-9 -> guile > -------------- > > I think that ice-9 is a weird namespace for "guile's standard library" > but it's what we have for historical reasons. Still I would have > preferred that namespace simply be "guile", so we have (guile match) and > (guile format) instead of (ice-9 ...). It would be clearer what ice-9 > *is* to have it be called "guile" instead. But maybe it's too late for > that. How much work would it be to do an alias like this? > Indeed. And, no, I don't think it is a lot of work at all. We should have an easy way to create module aliases, rename it, setup ice-9 as an alias and deprecate it. But, I wonder if "guile" is the right name? Does that mean that the other sibling directories, like "language", "oop" and "sxml" is *not* guile? Perhaps "base" or "core" are good alternatives?