Il giorno sab, 26/02/2022 alle 11.36 -0500, Vijay Marupudi ha scritto: > > I get a result I don't understand: this return 2 values > > Reading the source code, the second value is an implementation > detail, > keeping track of the visited directories. > > > One is expected, it's the one I wanted to produce > > Great! I would ignore the second value, because it is a by product of > the recursive implementation of file-system-fold, where it passes the > visited list to recursive invocations of itself. > > ~ Vijay
Thank you The manual says: " Files and directories, as identified by their device/inode number pair, are traversed only once. " I assumed this meant this was kept track of internally, I didn't expect this to be part of what the procedure returns Thanks again