On Tue, 08 Mar 2022, Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote:
> I think in some other languages this would be encoded in > the type or class or the exception itself. One would catch > only exceptions of a specific type. This is a convention > inside the code, which does not necessarily spread to other > programs or code bases. I would almost always make a type if the exception can be handled by user code. For internal raise/catch, not necessary. This is also better for testing purpose with srfi-64 `test-error` where you can specify the error type. -- Olivier Dion Polymtl
