John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:22:26PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
> >
> > Backtrace:
>
> [...]
>
> > ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module"
> (gnutls)) #f]
>
> Does it work if you do:
>
> make clean-go && make guix/build/download.go && make
>
>
> That command completed without error. Yes.
Argh, this is annoying. The regression was introduced in 861693f3,
which introduces a dependency from (guix download) to (guix build
download), which in turn depends on (gnutls).
Could you try if this patch helps?
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 9462878..a99f8c1 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -27,25 +27,16 @@ nodist_noinst_SCRIPTS = \
include gnu-system.am
MODULES = \
- guix/scripts/build.scm \
- guix/scripts/download.scm \
- guix/scripts/import.scm \
- guix/scripts/package.scm \
- guix/scripts/gc.scm \
- guix/scripts/hash.scm \
- guix/scripts/pull.scm \
- guix/scripts/substitute-binary.scm \
- guix/scripts/refresh.scm \
guix/base32.scm \
guix/records.scm \
guix/hash.scm \
guix/utils.scm \
+ guix/download.scm \
guix/monads.scm \
guix/profiles.scm \
guix/serialization.scm \
guix/nar.scm \
guix/derivations.scm \
- guix/download.scm \
guix/gnu-maintenance.scm \
guix/licenses.scm \
guix/build-system.scm \
@@ -71,12 +62,22 @@ MODULES = \
guix/build/rpath.scm \
guix/packages.scm \
guix/snix.scm \
+ guix/scripts/download.scm \
+ guix/scripts/build.scm \
+ guix/scripts/import.scm \
+ guix/scripts/package.scm \
+ guix/scripts/gc.scm \
+ guix/scripts/hash.scm \
+ guix/scripts/pull.scm \
+ guix/scripts/substitute-binary.scm \
+ guix/scripts/refresh.scm \
guix.scm \
$(GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES)
# Because of the autoload hack in (guix build download), we must build it
# first to avoid errors on systems where (gnutls) is unavailable.
guix/scripts/download.go: guix/build/download.go
+guix/download.go: guix/build/download.go
GOBJECTS = $(MODULES:%.scm=%.go) guix/config.go
It’s really a kludge, though, but I can’t think of any good fix.
Perhaps we’ll just end up requiring Guile-GnuTLS at some point.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
