On 02/03/2014 11:17 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Just one last question: Is there a reason you did not add libmicrohttpd as > an input? Or should I add it again?
I had forgotten to add it, nevertheless it should be added to the inputs as it is a direct dependency. But how did the build succeed if libmicrohttpd were not listed in inputs? > > The "official" description printed with "make sync-descriptions" is different, > but in fact adds only this sentence: > The package includes gnunet-gtk, which provides a GTK+ graphical user > interface to the GNUnet service. > I think here the official description should be changed. First of all, > what is "the package"? And as far as I can tell, gnunet-gtk would be a > distinct package. The official GNU description and synopsis for GNUnet seems to be not updated in a while. It stresses only the file-sharing application while it has now newer applications like GNS and Conversation. Christian, could you please update those? Sree
