The license for the Liberation fonts. I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should
it be just ‘silofl’? Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1"
or "SILOFL 1.1" or something else?
>From ef66e2f801d5b54bb16074bea747888e6ed4e5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:38:04 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.
* guix/licenses.scm (silofl1.1): New variable.
---
guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
index 8b7ea53..3f1e8b0 100644
--- a/guix/licenses.scm
+++ b/guix/licenses.scm
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
psfl public-domain
qpl
ruby
+ silofl1.1
vim
x11 x11-style
zlib
@@ -267,6 +268,11 @@ which may be a file:// URI pointing the package's tree."
"http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Ruby";
"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/license.txt";))
+(define silofl1.1
+ (license "SIL Open Font License 1.1"
+ "http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web";
+ "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#SILOFL";))
+
(define vim
(license "Vim"
"http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Vim7.2";
--
2.1.2
