David Thompson <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes:
> 宋文武 <iyzs...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +1 for return 'manifest', in a same way as 'operating-system'.
>> And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:
>>
>> (manifest
>> (map package-specification->manifest-entry
>> '("emacs"
>> "font-adobe-source-han-sans:cn")))
>
> I don't like that idea because the text specification is just a syntax
> for shell users. In Scheme, we can use the package objects directly
> rather than encode them as strings.
Well, by this way, I don't need to figure out which modules packages
belong to.
It works great, thanks!
