On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-12 19:35 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: >> > [...] >>> Actually, I think it will be more clear to use 'sdl-union' here, because >>> the workaround is more concise, WDYT? >> >> Indeed. > > What about using 'sdl-union' in ‘abbaye’ as well? > > I have switched ‘abbaye’ to 'modify-phases' syntax, but since it is > trivial I didn't send the patch for it (I hope it's OK).
LGTM. Thanks! - Dave
