Ludovic Courtès (2016-01-23 20:18 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <[email protected]> skribis: > >> +(define license-name->license > > I just realized that I’d rather call it ‘lookup-license’ for > consistency, because it’s not a conversion.
OK, I'll rename it, and what about:
(define (license-name->uri name)
(and=> (license-name->license name)
license-uri))
Should it be called ‘lookup-license-uri’ maybe?
--
Alex
