Eric Bavier <ericbav...@openmailbox.org> skribis: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >> Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: >> >> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the >> >> > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake, >> >> > since it seems to lead to a lot of confusion. >> >> > So I will hide both the internal packages one of these days. >> >> OK. >> > >> > Well, in the end this is not so easily possible. >> > >> > gnuplot depends on texlive-bin as a native-input. I replaced this by >> > texlive-minimal, but I think the native input can be dropped completely. >> >> Not sure. Eric added the dependency on TeX Live in 97003b5c. >> Eric, WDYT? > > Gnuplot looks for some binaries to determine whether and where to > install some latex sty files. As long as those are still installed with > texlive-minimal, that should be fine. I used texlive-bin in order to > remove the heavyweight texlive dependency.
Would Gnuplot’s own sty files still be installed if we remove the dependency? Or are they redundant with what TeX Live provides? Thanks, Ludo’.
