On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 18:18:45 +0200 Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote:
> This follows a convention used by some other GNU packages like Autoconf, > Bison, Coreutils, and Gnulib. > > * doc.am: Rename to ... > * doc/local.mk: ... this. > * emacs.am: Rename to ... > * emacs/local.mk: ... this. > * gnu-system.am: Rename to ... > * gnu/local.mk: ... this. > * daemon.am: Rename to ... > * nix/local.mk: ... this. > * Makefile.am: Adapt to them. > * doc/guix.texi (Porting to a New Platform): Adapt documentation. > * guix/config.scm.in (%state-directory, %config-directory): Adapt comments. > * emacs/guix-config.el.in (guix-config-state-directory): Likewise. > --- > Makefile.am | 8 +- > daemon.am | 226 ------------- > doc.am | 157 --------- > doc/guix.texi | 2 +- > doc/local.mk | 157 +++++++++ > emacs.am | 73 ---- > emacs/guix-config.el.in | 2 +- > emacs/local.mk | 73 ++++ > gnu-system.am | 883 > ------------------------------------------------ > gnu/local.mk | 883 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > guix/config.scm.in | 4 +- > nix/local.mk | 226 +++++++++++++ > 12 files changed, 1347 insertions(+), 1347 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 daemon.am > delete mode 100644 doc.am > create mode 100644 doc/local.mk > delete mode 100644 emacs.am > create mode 100644 emacs/local.mk > delete mode 100644 gnu-system.am > create mode 100644 gnu/local.mk > create mode 100644 nix/local.mk > I don't prefer the "local.mk" convention. It becomes non-obvious that the file is input for Automake, and the name loses any descriptive power. Just my 2 cents. `~Eric
