Glad to help! It's an absolute delight to `guix environment -l guix.scm` for every workflow and know that its gong to work.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 at 14:32 Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: > > Ben Woodcroft <donttrust...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 28/04/16 21:56, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 28/04/16 16:27, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >>> Ben Woodcroft <wood...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> On 28/04/16 15:19, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >>>>> Rob Syme <rob.s...@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>> > >>>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/ruby-symlinkfix.patch: New patch to fix > >>>>>> issue #1448. > >>>>>> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby): Update to 2.3.1 including symlink > >>>>>> patch. > >>>>> Thank you! The patch also needs to be registered in > >>>>> dist_patch_DATA in > >>>>> “gnu/local.mk”. I can do this later when applying the patch in the > >>>>> office, unless there are other objections to this patch. > >>>> Do you mind holding off for a bit (no more than ~10 hours)? I wouldn't > >>>> mind having a play with this myself. > >>> No problem. I can also apply this tomorrow if your tests find no > >>> problems. Thanks! > >> > >> Ruby-hashery now fails a unit test, but since that is a higher level > >> package and ruby-ansi works I think it might be good to apply the > >> patch here anyway. Would you mind please? > > > > I've just pushed a slightly modified version of Rob's patch and a patch > > for ruby-hashery to master; I believe all the packages in > > gnu/packages/ruby.scm build now. > > Thanks Ben, and thanks Rob for the patch! > > ~~ Ricardo > >
