John Darrington writes: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm. > * gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm. > * gnu/packages/tex.scm: Renamed from texlive.scm. > * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/docbook.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/gettext.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/maths.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/music.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/plotutils.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/python.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > > What is the purpose of doing that? I thought that texlive was the chosen > name that the project had. > > I think there are a few other implementations of TeX in the wild (though > mostly unmaintained). Furthermore, I think Knuth has a trademark on the word > "tex". > > J'
See this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00702.html I want to add Texmaker (an editor for TeX). Putting it in texlive.scm wouldn't really fit because it's not part of Texlive. So, the idea is to put everything TeX-related into one file (tex.scm). Kind regards, Roel Janssen
