Hey Alex, I'm hoping this patch is up to snuff. I've changed the package definition to depend on the latest tagged source and provided a synopsis & description specific to vte-ng. Let me know if you have any other concerns that need to be addressed. Thanks!
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mckinley Olsen (2016-04-09 21:10 +0300) wrote: > >> Sorry, I'm new to mailing lists; hope this gets to the right place > > Oops, it wasn't Cc-ed to guix-devel list, but since I'm replying, the > others will see it anyway. > >> I used the git checkout, as I started writing termite's package first >> and realized it needed a recursive checkout; of course I copied over >> that implementation to here. Thanks for the suggestion to use the >> tarball, I've made that change >> >> I used the version I did because I was using the package definition >> in Nix as a guideline. I've worked through packaging a slightly more >> up-to-date version (submitted patch to update pcre2 to required >> version), but am stuck on getting versions 0.43.91 and newer packaged >> due to an error (vteconv.cc:774:40: error: missing sentinel in >> function call [-Werror=format=]), which I believe was caused by this >> change: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762863 >> >> I'm quite new to the gnu build system, so it has taken me some time >> >> Sorry I haven't been able to get the newest packaged up. I've just >> found that the gnome-updates branch contains some code working >> through the exact error I'm seeing with vte-ng, so I might reach out >> for them or wait for it to be merged. > > Ah, I think it's ok to wait for gnome-updates merge. Thanks for working > on the new packages! > > -- > Alex
0001-gnu-packages-gnome.scm-vte-ng-New-variable.patch
Description: Binary data