On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:54:02PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > > > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > >> [...] > >> > >> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at > >> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the > >> manpage timestamps. > > Cool! > > > >> > >> These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but > >> also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a > >> few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to > >> another branch? > >> > > I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it > > frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far). > > (Oops, I replied before seeing your message.) I have a slight > preference for ‘core-updates’, which I hope can be merged within a few > days. Sounds good?
I incorporated the reviewers' comments and applied to core-updates, bringing it to 98529948. Thank you!
