On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:18:41AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > I'm totally agree with this; nowadays I always use --dry-run with > > --no-grafts option. > Same here… > > As a user I expect that --dry-run means no building at all. > But honestly, I think changing ‘--dry-run’ to do ‘--dry-run --no-grafts’ > would be fine, and probably better than the current situation.
Yes, this is what I would expect. We could also have a "--dry-run --grafts" option if anybody complains about the missing feature. Andreas
