Hi, Am 05.09.2016 um 12:59 schrieb Vincent Legoll: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Hartmut Goebel > <h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> wrote: >> This avoids the need to set #:tests? #f whenever using #:jar-name >> (and thus using the default build.xml). > Isn't it a bit misleading to have a test target that does no real > testing, or am I > misunderstanding this patch ?
When specifying #:jar-file, the ant-builder will create a build.xml. This build.xml did not include a test-target at all. So one *always* had to include "#:tests? #f" to disable calling the (non-existing) test-target - otherwise build would fail. But adding "#:tests? #f" is just redundant. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
