Danny Milosavljevic <dan...@scratchpost.org> writes:
>> No, it is not. lzo was number 2 in the original patch couple and is
>> still intended to be applied as such.
>
> I see what you mean but I really doubt that patchwork can see it (also
> because of the subject it probably will replace the entire set by just this
> package).
>
Okay, I understand but won't send it again.
I used patchwork for a while, and looking at the past discussions about
alternatives and looking at how much functionality it lacks and almost
no one except ludovic, myself and maybe 2 more people seemed to use
it. So I don't care about patchworks as it is broken. Whoever applies my
patches uses email, no need to adjust my work to a broken tool we
started to test.
Good night
--
ng0
