ng0 <ngillm...@runbox.com> writes: > Hi, > > Kei I think you need to consider packaging one of the "pre" versions of > lynx. I understand we are fixed on packaging this with gnutls, so if you > read the changelog of the recent pre versions releases, you will > discover that there was work on gnutls support. If you don't want to > package pre version itself, there might be patches directly. I don't > know how this all works together and it wasn't my intention to find out > when I looked into this, but we should really consider to package recent > pre release of lynx. Note that this is not dev, dev is more experimental > than pre. >
I only see lynx 2.8.9 development tarballs. I don't have a problem targeting those temporarily if it is acceptable to package it and it works.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
