Am 20.11.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Julien Lepiller:
> What do you think? should I continue in that direction, or should I go
> back to what I was doing before?
Thanks for working on this. I will give it a try the next days. But I
want to share two points going around in my head:
1) I propose moving the nginx service into a package
gnu/service/nginx.scm. Imagine we will implement an equal complex config
schema for apache. Then we will get a beast of code with lots of useless
"nginx-" prefixes.
2) Is it possible to add some magic to e.g. "nginx-service-type" so that
all identifiers within are searched in the "nginx" scope. Example:
(service-extension
nginx-service-type
(const (list (server ;; taken from "nginx" scope
(blocks (list))
(configs (list
(option (type 'server_name) ;; taken from
"nginx" scope
(value (list 'default)))
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
