Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > ng0 <n...@libertad.pw> skribis: > >> Hartmut Goebel <h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> writes: >> >>> Am 29.11.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >>>> Good. When you fix it (and other failures, if any), we can start a new >>>> evaluation or merge directly in master (the sooner the better!). >>> >>> Done. >>> >>> I'm very glad the new python build system is now in master. Thanks to >>> everybody who helped finishing this! >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Hartmut Goebel >>> >>> | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | >>> | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible | >> >> Great job! >> >> So should I fix up all my ~70 or how many there are python >> packages which I've sent in since september to get someone (or >> hopefully multiple someones) to review them? > > Please do ping people. Most likely the patch series fell into the > cracks and only you can remind people of it.
Most likely, but there were also other issues. Like Harmut wanted to do gunicorn while I was working on it at some point, so I dropped that the series was forgotten. But I need to fix conflicts anyway. I guess I can send in most of them by sunday, there were also issues in many of the packages I need to address. When I do this before people start to work on them it's a bit easier to review as old issues aren't repeated. I think most of them were in version-control, python, networking, and it included the patches for kallithea, searx, and some other software. > I think Hartmut would be a good candidate to review them, Hartmut is our > Python expert now. :-) > > Ludo’. > -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 | ng0.chaosnet.org