Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcr...@uq.edu.au> writes: > Hi Marius, > > On 26/12/16 23:18, Ben Woodcroft wrote: >> On 26/12/16 03:09, Marius Bakke wrote: >>> In good tradition, ruby made a new release today (25/12)[0]. >>> >>> I tried building some packages with the new version, but ruby-minitest >>> complains that Rake 12 is too new (even with the latest minitest). There >>> have been some core changes as well, with Fixnum and Bignum now merged >>> into a single Integer class. >> I updated ruby-minitest to the newest version and pushed, but as you >> mention the check phase requires rake <12. This actually stems from >> hoe though rather than minitest, I've asked the devs about it here: >> https://github.com/seattlerb/hoe/issues/77 > This issue has now been fixed in hoe, in the just released 3.16.0. I > just pushed this to master after building the downstream packages > without issue as '8e941f20',.
Cool, thanks! >>> I suggest that we keep ruby 2.3 as the main "ruby" variable until the >>> ecosystem catches up. Users will still get the latest version when >>> using `guix package` or `guix environment`. WDYT? >> I would agree, but I'd hope that the hoe issue is an isolated one and >> that we can make ruby-2.4 the default very soon. > What do you think about making 2.4 the default and pushing to staging, > if there are no obvious issues? Sounds good for the next staging cycle :-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
