ng0 <contact....@cryptolab.net> writes: >> I might be overlooking something, but my gut reaction is that (1) it’s >> not “bundling” in that we don’t have any other package providing >> mkpasswd, and (2) it’s up to upstream to decide whether or not to >> distribute mkpasswd. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Ludo’. >> > And upstreams decision is not to do it (on making it a choice not > to build it or to move it to another tarball): > > "No, but thank you for asking." > > I think it's informative and neutral enough that I can just share > this. > > So we stick with the default case? I'm still in favor for making > it separate guix packages.
I’d rather stick with what upstream provides. I don’t see an advantage of separating these tools. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net
