On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:07:28PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: > I agree with Marius's option 5. I don't see an immediate reason to > remove it, and we can build icedtea-7 using gcj.
I actually hadn't noticed that icedtea-7 builds with icedtea-6. I thought it simply inherited from the package definition. I don't think we should remove it in that case. And GCJ has been removed from GCC AFAIK.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
