Hi, Am 30.01.2017 um 10:10 schrieb ng0: > >>> + (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz")) >> I'd keep the original name, but this may be a matter of taste. > The original file name has some "+something2.tar.gz" in it, I want > to be consistent with what we provide. > Or what do you mean?
I suggest keeping te original filename. But I don't know the exacpt conventions at Guix for this. > Thanks, I will apply this. They should fix their pypi source (if I got > it from there). ACK. >>> + (synopsis "Web user interface for GNU Mailman") >> Mention "Mailman 3"? > We only "have" version 3, why should I mention a version then? I > can do it... Did Mailman prior to version 3 have different > frontends than version 3? Mailman 3 is a completely new product. AFAIK most part are re-developed from scratch. OTOH at http://list.org/ they are just mentioning "Mailman" and "versions are 2.1.23 … and 3.0.3 …". An at mailman-bundler [1] they write "This is GNU Mailman" and "This package installs GNU Mailman". So probably we should stay with what you did: just call ist "Mailman". [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mailman-bundler/3.0.0 > >> Please move it down to the description - I overlooked it first. > I assume you mean the "Web user interface for GNU Mailman 3". > In case I haven't mentioned it there, I will do so, okay. I meant the "synopsis" entry which I expect to be beside the description and not separate. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
